A 14 CFR Part 91 operator of a turbine-powered rotorcraft may elect to use which of the following inspection provisions?

The option referring to the choice of either an annual inspection or a manufacturer-recommended inspection program is correct because it aligns with the regulations set forth in 14 CFR Part 91. This part allows operators of turbine-powered rotorcraft the flexibility to choose between an annual inspection, which is a comprehensive evaluation that must be conducted every 12 calendar months, or a current inspection program that is recommended by the rotorcraft's manufacturer.

This provision ensures that operators have the ability to maintain their aircraft in a way that complies with industry standards while also considering the specific recommendations and practices suggested by the manufacturer, which may cater to the operational characteristics and maintenance needs of their particular rotorcraft model. Having this option enhances safety and can lead to more efficient maintenance practices, as manufacturer recommendations are often based on the most updated knowledge of the aircraft systems.

The other options do not provide the same range of flexibility. While an annual inspection is a standard requirement, it would not be the only allowable method for compliance under these regulations. Manufacturer-recommended programs provide an alternative that can be particularly beneficial, especially for newer aircraft or those with specific operational requirements. A visual pre-flight inspection, on the other hand, while essential for safety, cannot substitute for the more comprehensive inspections necessary for continued